2006 Ford Fusion vs. 1977 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2006 Ford Fusion is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Fusion (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 1500.
Because 1977 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Fusion (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Fusion | 1977 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Fusion | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1450 mm |
