2006 Ford Fusion vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 2006 Ford Fusion is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2006 Ford Fusion. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Fusion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Fusion weights approximately 185 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-2.

Because 1978 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Fusion. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Fusion.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Fusion 1978 Mazda RX-2
Make Ford Mazda
Model Fusion RX-2
Year Released 2006 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1388 cc 2290 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 79 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 124 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1145 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 2480 mm