2006 Ford Fusion vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Fusion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Fusion would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Fusion weights approximately 875 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Fusion (212 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Fusion | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Fusion | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 212 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 33 L |