2006 Ford Galaxy vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2006 Ford Galaxy is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. Both 2006 Ford Galaxy and 1992 Holden Apollo are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Ford Galaxy. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Galaxy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Galaxy weights approximately 445 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Galaxy. (170 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Galaxy.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Galaxy | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Galaxy | Apollo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2610 mm |