2006 Ford Galaxy vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Ford Galaxy is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2006 Ford Galaxy. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Galaxy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 61 kg more than 2006 Ford Galaxy. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Galaxy. (240 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Galaxy.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Galaxy | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Galaxy | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1739 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 78 L |