2006 Ford GT vs. 1978 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2006 Ford GT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford GT (550 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 524 more horse power than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford GT weights approximately 844 kg more than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford GT (678 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 626 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford GT | 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | GT | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 550 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 678 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1584 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1940 mm |