2006 Ford GT vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2006 Ford GT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford GT. (678 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford GT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford GT | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | GT | HRT |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5409 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 493 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
