2006 Ford GT vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford GT would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 826 kg more than 2006 Ford GT.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford GT (678 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford GT | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | GT | Commander |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2987 cc |
| Horse Power | 550 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1584 kg | 2410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 2270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
