2006 Ford GT vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford GT would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford GT (550 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 2009 Volvo XC90. (235 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 14 kg more than 2006 Ford GT.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford GT (678 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford GT | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | GT | XC90 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 550 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 678 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1584 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 80 L |