2006 Ford Ikon vs. 1964 Sunbeam Imp
To start off, 2006 Ford Ikon is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Imp would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ikon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ikon weights approximately 968 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Imp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Imp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ikon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ikon | 1964 Sunbeam Imp | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Ikon | Imp |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 875 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 27 L |