2006 Ford Ikon vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2006 Ford Ikon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ikon (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ikon should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 76 kg more than 2006 Ford Ikon.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ikon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ikon. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ikon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ikon | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ikon | CJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |