2006 Ford Ikon vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2006 Ford Ikon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ikon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ikon | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ikon | FTO |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 197 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10 L/100km |