2006 Ford Ikon vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2006 Ford Ikon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ikon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ikon weights approximately 1590 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ikon. (110 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ikon. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ikon has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ikon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ikon | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ikon | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 152 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |
