2006 Ford Ikon vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ikon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ikon would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ikon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ikon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ikon (110 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ikon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ikon | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ikon | Micra |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 46 L |