2006 Ford Ka vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 2006 Ford Ka is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ka (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ka weights approximately 137 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ka | 1982 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Ka | L |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 68.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 38 L |
