2006 Ford Ka vs. 1984 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2006 Ford Ka is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Tempo weights approximately 86 kg more than 2006 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ka | 1984 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ka | Tempo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |