2006 Ford Ka vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2006 Ford Ka is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ka weights approximately 256 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ka | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ka | Minica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |