2006 Ford Ka vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Ford Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 383 kg more than 2006 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ka | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.1 seconds | 11 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |