2006 Ford Mondeo vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Ford Mondeo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mondeo (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 310 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mondeo (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mondeo | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mondeo | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |