2006 Ford Mondeo vs. 2012 Holden Calais

To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Mondeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Mondeo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 150 more horse power than 2006 Ford Mondeo. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Mondeo.

Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Mondeo. (175 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Mondeo. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Mondeo has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Mondeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Mondeo 2012 Holden Calais
Make Ford Holden
Model Mondeo Calais
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1798 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 128 HP 278 HP
Torque 175 Nm 350 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.2 L/100km 9.3 L/100km