2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 2182 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Mustang | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | Mustang | Ardea 3 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4604 cc | 903 cc |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 28 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 6.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 674 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 29 L |
