2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1686 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |