2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 46 kg more than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (868 Nm) has 703 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Mustang | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 868 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1244 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
