2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1968 Lotus 49
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus 49 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus 49 (405 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2006 Ford Mustang. (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus 49 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1199 kg more than 1968 Lotus 49.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 1968 Lotus 49 | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Mustang | 49 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 405 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 516 kg |