2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Reliant Rebel

To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 1972 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 2281 kg more than 1972 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Reliant Rebel. (53 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Reliant Rebel.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Mustang 1972 Reliant Rebel
Make Ford Reliant
Model Mustang Rebel
Year Released 2006 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4605 cc 701 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 300 HP 31 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 434 Nm 53 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2856 kg 575 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 3510 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2270 mm