2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 975 kg more than 1981 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Mustang | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1940 mm |