2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 890 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Mustang | 1982 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Mustang | L |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 68.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 38 L |
