2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1983 Mini MK V
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK V would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 619 kg more than 1983 Mini MK V.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mini MK V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (868 Nm) has 798 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK V. (70 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Mustang | 1983 Mini MK V | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Mustang | MK V |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 41 HP |
| Torque | 868 Nm | 70 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1244 kg | 625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2040 mm |
