2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 2086 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Mustang | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |
