2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Toyota Sera
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Sera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Sera would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1992 Toyota Sera. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Toyota Sera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 815 kg more than 1992 Toyota Sera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Sera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota Sera. (132 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota Sera.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 1992 Toyota Sera | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Sera |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 132 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 73.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |