2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Lada Niva
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 1995 Lada Niva | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Mustang | Niva |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 42 L |