2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1999 Acura CL. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 102 kg more than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Mustang | CL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 150 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 65 L |