2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (868 Nm) has 509 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan R 391. (359 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan R 391. 1999 Nissan R 391 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan R 391 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | R 391 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
Torque | 868 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |