2006 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1999 Renault Scenic. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 230 kg more than 1999 Renault Scenic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Scenic. (260 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Scenic |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 19.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |