2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2006 Ford Mustang. (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 5 kg more than 2001 Jaguar XJ220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (1,077 Nm) has 643 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Mustang. (434 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Mustang | XJ220 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 1077 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2230 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2720 mm |