2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Mustang | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2380 mm |