2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP) has 230 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 2112 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Mustang | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 434 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1810 mm |