2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 975 kg more than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Mustang | Cabrio Passion |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 33 L |