2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (197 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |