2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 Volvo S60

To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 314 kg more than 2006 Ford Mustang.

Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo S60. (286 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo S60.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Mustang 2008 Volvo S60
Make Ford Volvo
Model Mustang S60
Year Released 2006 2008
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 0 HP
Torque 325 Nm 286 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.4 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 90 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1220 kg 1534 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.7 L/100km 9.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 70 L