2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Lancia Musa

To start off, 2010 Lancia Musa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2010 Lancia Musa. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Lancia Musa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 365 kg more than 2010 Lancia Musa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lancia Musa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lancia Musa. (260 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lancia Musa.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Mustang 2010 Lancia Musa
Make Ford Lancia
Model Mustang Musa
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type Convertible Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 1910 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 260 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.5 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 90.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1715 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4040 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.7 L/100km 5.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 47 L