2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Tata Indica
To start off, 2010 Tata Indica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 104 kg more than 2010 Tata Indica.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (868 Nm) has 752 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Indica. (116 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 2010 Tata Indica | |
Make | Ford | Tata |
Model | Mustang | Indica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 868 Nm | 116 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1244 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 37 L |