2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |