2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Land Rover Freelander

To start off, 2012 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2012 Land Rover Freelander. (229 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Land Rover Freelander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 370 kg more than 2012 Land Rover Freelander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Land Rover Freelander. (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Land Rover Freelander.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Mustang 2012 Land Rover Freelander
Make Ford Land Rover
Model Mustang Freelander
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4604 cc 3190 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 229 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 434 Nm 317 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.2 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 96 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2856 kg 2486 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 24.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]