2006 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Mustang would be higher.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Mustang | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Mustang | SX4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 63 L |