2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1942 Jeep MB
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1942 Jeep MB. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1942 Jeep MB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1942 Jeep MB | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Ranger | MB |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3820 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2040 mm |
