2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Ranger | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3260 mm |
