2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1944 Simca 8
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Simca 8 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1944 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1944 Simca 8.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1944 Simca 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1944 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Ranger | 8 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1944 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1090 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2430 mm |
