2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1946 Peugeot 202
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Peugeot 202. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1946 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 202 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1133 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2460 mm |