2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1946 Peugeot 202
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 358 kg more than 1946 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Peugeot 202. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1946 Peugeot 202 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Ranger | 202 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1133 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 78 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2460 mm |
